Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossover jazz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Crossover music. Sandstein 14:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crossover jazz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO. First and fourth sources do not use the term "crossover jazz", second and third are just directory listings. Previously declined from prod in 2019 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Crossover music: The article Talk page shows a longstanding concern about whether this topic has demonstrable specific notability. The Grove article on the broader "Crossover" topic describes it as "an artificial concept, dependent on the sometimes arbitrary and/or non-musical definitions of the charts" [1], indicating the problem of a durable definition for jazz-tinged or other examples. The main Crossover article is not particularly good either, but could be a suitable WP:ATD redirect target. AllyD (talk) 09:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.