Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crooked egg curve
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Crooked egg curve (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced and I was unable to find any sources under the name given. There is a web page for the curve under a different name, [1], but this site is self published and does not meet Wikipedia criteria for notability or reliability. RDBury (talk) 14:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Algebraic formulas can generate an infinite variety of curves. Giving one a name does not automatically mean that it is notable enough to have an encyclopedia article about it. Edison (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No references, no hits on mathscinet, no hits on google other than wikipedia mirrors, does not appear in the long list of curves in Cundy and Rolletts book (and I've never heard of it). r.e.b. (talk) 16:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems to be a neologism; I've never heard of this, and this is my area. Ozob (talk) 22:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.