Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative laser cutting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Creative laser cutting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A grand total of nine Google hits for this term. Additionally, created by an account with a spammy username, so there's the stench of promotion as well. Blueboy 96 22:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article is not NPOV in tone, much of the first paragraph is opinion, nothing is sourced. There may be scope for coverage of the use in architecture/design in laser cutting, but probably not enough for a separate article. Cassandra 73 (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Perhaps if a reliable ref is found any information could be incorporated in laser cutting. Wizard191 (talk) 23:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources suggest this topic warrants its own article. The text is clearly intended to promote a product and its suppliers, and since that text is entirely opinion if fails WP:NOR as well as WP:GNG. Johnuniq (talk) 00:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability.JamesBWatson (talk) 08:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Article was created by a user called Btypedesign. b-type design is a company which uses laser cutting to create marketing materials. Btypedesign put a link to www.btypedesign.com in the article, restoring the link when it was removed, until being blocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.