Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative Barcode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:45, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Barcode

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real claims of notability. Google search on "Creative Barcode" nonprofit shows only 254 unique results, mostly primary sources, blogs, and social media. Google news search on the same terms show no results. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep GHits aren't evidence of notability or not, GHits for a deliberately made-obscure search term certainly aren't indications of non-notability. There are already refs on the article, although those working so hard to delete it are happy to describe even WIPO as "obscure" to try and discredit them. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:01, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith, I placed a notabilty tag on the article not a speedy, and at the time all three references were primary, The WIPO agency magazine article having been written by the company owner.Teapotgeorge^Talk 18:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:01, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.