Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crash Duration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Critical path method. v/r - T P 02:53, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crash Duration

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. WP:DICTIONARY There is no other information available on this topic. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect? I'd do better with this if there were some context provided; given that I suspect this could be simply redirected into a main article. Mangoe (talk) 02:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Page creator removed AfD tag, have restored it. (Also, please try not to AfD articles two minutes after they're created, it can be seen as biting.) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:57, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 01:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Critical path method. There do seem to be loads of Ghits indicating that a WP entry is appropriate, but Critical path method seems to be the right place, and it looks as though at least some of the info here would improve it. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as per nom, wikipedia is not a dictionary, but the above is a valid reason for a merger of the topics. Jab843 (talk) 00:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom, not a dictionary. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 00:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.