Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coverage details of Google Maps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage details of Google Maps

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Out of date ({{update}} is on article) and a violation of WP:IINFO. Contested prod. ℳøℕø 01:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if it's out of date, update it. Significant information about widely used information sources is appropriate content. DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, since the entries that do not duplicate Google's own spreadsheet appear to depend on original research. We're not in the business either of duplicating (and having to update by hand) information that is better presented elsewhere or of doing our own research to discover and report on the limitations of various mapping services. I also find the WP:IINFO argument persuasive in this case. A link to Google's spreadsheet would be appropriate in the Google Maps article, however, if one isn't there already. Deor (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE. --TorriTorri^{(Talk to me!)} 23:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as indiscriminate. I couldn't give a damn if this was updated or not! Please, don't waste your time and our time. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 20:20, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and request move to my userfy page. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 12:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.