Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Countdown (Transformers)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 00:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Countdown (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested by @JIP: for reason "this is the largest Micromaster toy". Of course, this must still pass GNG... FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 01:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 01:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per my PROD. TTN (talk) 02:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a NOQUORUM soft delete because of the contested PROD. An attempt to see if a firmer sense of consensus can be found.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a NOQUORUM soft delete because of the contested PROD. An attempt to see if a firmer sense of consensus can be found.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment There are 2 books in the citation list. Does anybody know how extensively they cover this character? Alternatively, are they lacking in independence? Rockphed (talk) 14:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete the books used as reference are WP:PRIMARY sources. Lacks secondary sourcing or external notability.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 00:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Lack of independent sources. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 18:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.