Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Council on Spiritual Practices
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Council on Spiritual Practices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organisation. Does not meet WP:NORG, particularly WP:ORGDEPTH. Tgeairn (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ORG. The only source given in the article, and the few I found in a search, are passing mentions, typically "Such-and-such was funded by the Council on Spiritual Practices". I could find no significant coverage at all. --MelanieN (talk) 20:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 06:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 06:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.