Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Couch burning
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Couch burning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable article about a subject not covered anywhere else Steve9821 (talk) 03:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP!! KEEP!! KEEP!! KEEP!! KEEP!! This phenomenon is well-referenced.
- Links: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] See? Lots of references to couch burning. User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 03:27, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete real but also really trivial. Could be mentioned in some WVU article, but not worth a seperate article or even a redirect. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A single source doesn't help it to pass WP:GNG. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:34, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is a stonewall A7 speedy delete IMHO. Barney the barney barney (talk) 09:56, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under A7, nothing reliable provided by the article creator anywhere, and no evidence of notability. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.