Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consulate-General of Indonesia in Houston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep both. Synergy 05:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Consulate-General of Indonesia in Houston

I don't see how these articles meet the notability criteria. There is at best minimal coverage in independent reliable sources of the consulate, and that coverage simply establishes that the consulate exists. Karanacs (talk) 15:50, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating

As a note, the parent articles of the nominated articles are Diplomatic missions of Russia and Diplomatic missions of Indonesia WhisperToMe (talk) 19:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both as there is sufficient coverage in reliable sources for both verifiability and notability. I have added a few more sources and expanded the Indonesian consulate article as bit as well. - Dravecky (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep both as per Dravecky. Additional sources for Russia can be found by searching for "Генеральное консульство Российской Федерации в Хьюстоне". This is another source, for example. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 11:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep both, conditionally There needs to be more substance in these articles. If after a while they remain stubs, they should be removed. Kransky (talk) 00:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Being a WP:STUB is not a reason to delete an article which meets WP:N. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 01:29, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both per significant coverage. Additionally, both Indonesia and Russia are major petroleum producing nations and it's of no coincidence they have diplomatic missions in the center of the US oil industry.--Oakshade (talk) 00:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notability is clear. Everyking (talk) 08:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.