Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Console bashing
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to console wars. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 07:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Console bashing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable neologism. Ironholds (talk) 00:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced, not notable term. Redundant with console wars although that article is itself pretty silly. Fletcher (talk) 00:18, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 00:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to console wars. This seems to me the same subject but from a very slightly different angle. —Noah 05:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete cannot find a good reason to invent an unlikely neologism, doesn't warrant a redirect. JBsupreme (talk) 08:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 08:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Console wars as a plausible search term. Otherwise, there is nothing else that is not mentioned in that article. MuZemike 08:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to console wars at best. At least one 2004 news article uses "console bashing" in a completely different sense. As a term it clearly hasn't even entered the lexicon of most gamers- while it's an "obvious" definition, that doesn't merit an article. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 16:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Console wars. It might deserve its own article on Wiktionary, but not here. SharkD (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per above. Although 'Console wars' might be considered a broader topic, it covers everything that would be considered relevant to this topic. C4Cypher (talk) 21:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.