Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Ingram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Connor Ingram

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG per lots of WP:ROUTINE sources and likely WP:TOOSOON in the best scenario. Fails WP:NHOCKEY as he does not qualify for criteria #1, #2, and #3 by not playing professionally, #4 as he has only been a Second Team All-Star in the major junior WHL, #5 as he was drafted in the 3rd round, and #6 as he has never played for Senior national team (U20 only). Yosemiter (talk) 15:52, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not yet a notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not pass either WP:GNG or WP:NHOCKEY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nominator. It's WPTOOSOON for this article and it fails WP:GNG because of a lack of non-routine significant coverage in reliable sources. - tucoxn\^talk 18:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.