Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connected Vehicle Technology
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:00, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Connected Vehicle Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a would-be-expired PROD that was twice contested by socks of the blocked author of the article (without explanation and by two accounts whose respective only edits were to contest the PROD). See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asarudeenm91. The original PROD reason was: Does not satisfy WP:GNG. Created for promotional purposes. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asarudeenm91/Archive and User_talk:Meatsgains#.5B.5BConnected_Vehicle_Technology.5D.5D.
Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Unintelligible attempt to promote some product. EEng 05:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs more input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Needs more input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete the extra captial letters give it away: that is Marketese, not English. And not even good Marketing Speak either. W Nowicki (talk) 17:50, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.