Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concepts of Nineteen Eighty-Four

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concepts of Nineteen Eighty-Four

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's a duplicate of a lot of pages that already exist with better sourcing and less original research. See Template:Nineteen Eighty-Four. Any useful content y'all happen to notice can be merged, but the article doesn't need to exist. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Great for a user page, but too much synthesizing for an encyclopedia article. Wickedjacob (talk) 07:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an essay / original research. The notable concepts here already have articles. Everything else is just a synthesis of highlights from the book... which really just makes it a strange WP:contentfork from the main book article. Shooterwalker (talk) 13:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per synthesis, too many fictional elements that are clearly not notable, Sadads (talk) 20:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
transwiki to annex.wikia.com 65.93.14.29 (talk) 05:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.