Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concept-oriented programming
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —David Eppstein 15:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Concept-oriented programming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article was deleted from ru-wiki as original research. the only author of the subject is the author of the article. his name is Savinov. The sources is - personal portal of Savinov, references - his books. I think, that this article must be deleted with all category Concept-oriented programming as original research--FearChild 17:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. If this had been written by an uninterested person, I think this would be a keep - since there seem to be published sources (although I don't know whether the listed journals and technical report are misleadingly vanity kind of things); but the concept doesn't seem particularly original or innovative to me and the self-interestedness of it completely taints the article for me. --Gwern (contribs) 17:37 15 October 2007 (GMT)
- Comment Two refs, one at Dr Dobbs, which is without a doubt reliable [1], and another at IEEE Internet Computing, but requires payment [2] (citation reads "Elsewhere," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 03, no. 4, pp. 16-18, Jul/Aug, 1999). Not knowing enough about the concepts involved, I don't know if these are related to the article at hand. Yngvarr 18:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research and vanity. The term 'Concept-oriented programming' has been referred to in respected journals such as Dr. Dobbs, [3] but seemingly meaning something entirely different to Savinov's definition. If the author of the article could provide independent authoritative sources for the article, it could be saved, though.--Michig 18:15, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:OR. The fact that the references are all to the creators papers and the external link doesn't list a single paper by any other author speaks to the notability of the subject. Cosmo0 18:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.