Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computerology (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy-deleted WP:CSD#G3 by LadyofShalott. Non-admin closure. JohnCD (talk) 07:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Computerology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Another "joke" religion, but Wikipedia is not for religions made up one day. Fails WP:V and WP:N. This is not the same as the subject of the previous AfD, so it does not qualify for WP:CSD#G4. Contested PROD. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 07:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —JohnCD (talk) 09:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- My opinion remains the same as expressed in the {{prod2}} notice that I added. Uncle G (talk) 12:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G3 or G11.--Pattont/c 13:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete – Wikipedia is not for stuff madeup by one day. Possible G3. LOL at the comment made when the PROD was contested, which is still there → [1]. MuZemike 16:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete of all the computerology's on all the computerised websites I could find on Google this is possibly the least notable - it only seems to exist on that Wikipedia thingy ϢereSpielChequers 19:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a fancruft neologism and a joke. Transwiki to Uncyclopedia when possible. Junk Police (talk) 23:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Highly entertaining, but I'm about to give it a G3 speedy deletion. LadyofShalott Weave 03:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.