Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compliance hacker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 04:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Compliance hacker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD reason was "no evidence that anybody uses this term" Nominating because looking for such evidence the only "reliable" source I could find that uses the term seems to be the xcyss website, which just happens to sell a "XCySS Certified Compliance Hacker" certification. Outside of this, there appears to be no use of the term. - Sudo Ghost 05:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also, the term appears to be the same as white hat hacker.--Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me bro!} 08:22, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems a neologism that the editor (who happens to be User:Xcyss) is trying to push by getting a wikipedia article on it. That editor has not done anything except this article and links to it. W Nowicki (talk) 22:35, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.