Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Competitions and prizes in artificial intelligence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Whether this should be a list or not is left to discretion of editors. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 20:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Competitions and prizes in artificial intelligence

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically a WP:CATALOG without any sourced entries, and the whole article isn't based on a notable topic. PROD was declined "given government involvement", but the article is still promotional. wumbolo ^^^ 16:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:CATALOG is irrelevant as this is not a sales catalog. The topic passes WP:GNG and WP:LISTN – see Artificial Intelligence And Information-control Systems Of Robots or The Nexus between Artificial Intelligence and Economics, for example. Andrew D. (talk) 20:32, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article of course has some useful encylopedic content. As per Andrew, it passes GNG and LISTN. KCVelaga (talk) 05:29, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It has fair spread on encyclopedic knowledge, its informative and well sourced. Keep. scope_creep (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but - Change it into a list. The subject itself is not a topic of notability. Hence, this article may fall in WP:SYNTH. If any organization publishes a list then that list might become notable if it meets Notability guidelines. Please refer H:LIST for further guidance.--Wikishagnik (talk) 11:24, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is well written as it is. It a presents a series of competitions and prizes and it is closed, meaning no extraneous spam or promotional junk. Why change it into a list. I wont add anything to improve structural layout and will lose information scope_creep (talk)
Keep: meets WP:GNG / WP:LISTN. I'm neutral on the move. Fine as is, it seems. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:09, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG and also I agree that WP:LISTN is satisfied. the List is encyclopaedic and notable. [1][2]. If there are concerns on promo content, then a clean up tag is the answer, not the AfD tag. --DBig Xrayᗙ 12:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.