Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Competiţia Zece (3rd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 04:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Competiţia Zece (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No credible claim of notability as found through independent sources exists here. We have the competition's own website, a couple of self-published sites, and passing mention in a newspaper (which is now a dead link). Nothing approaches the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" standard. Biruitorul Talk 15:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: previously nominated under a different title, here and here.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Self-promotional, non-existent as far as secondary sources go. Dahn (talk) 12:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sources lack notability, and as said above, the article seems to be self-promotional. Rxlxm (talk) 02:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.