Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of web based file managers

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 October 19.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of web based file managers

This table comparing seemingly arbitrary traits of web-based file managers (it's hard to see why the first public release date would be relevant even to someone comparing these items) fails to assert notability. To the extent that such an assemblage of data would be appropriate anywhere, it is WP:NOT in an encyclopedia (maybe a software review site or somesuch). Bongomatic (talk) 14:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as mostly original research. Stifle (talk) 15:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original research that is unencyclopedic. --Pmedema (talk) 19:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I made the article to address what I thought was a lack of information about web based file managers from the main file managers article which also links to a comparison of file managers article. Comparison and contrast between different software packages in the form of "Comparison of..." articles is something that has seemingly been accepted. I do need to cite my sources, of course. However, I see no reason for the article to be deleted so long as the sources are cited. Archer1742 (talk) 17:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This article directly complements the comparison of file managers article. Archer1742 (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Stifle and Pmedema. MvjsTalking 09:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.