Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of rocket propellants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:49, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of rocket propellants

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposing article for deletion. No verifiable sources; little content. Confusing to Wikipedia readers. N2e (talk) 01:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE, as nom. N2e (talk) 01:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 3. Snotbot t • c » 02:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it were sourced, it could be merged to Rocket propellant, otherwise delete. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Rocket propellant should be comprehensive enough so that readers can make their own comparisons. In fact that should be the main focus of that article. No need for this one. Borock (talk) 04:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.