Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of online interactive charts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of online interactive charts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I may well be wrong, but I don't feel that this belongs in an encyclopaedia. It seems to be a comparative list of charting products, and it is only referenced to the respective sites for those products. None of them appear to have an article on Wikipedia. One of the companies behind the products has an article (but this isn't shown in the article - the company site is linked instead). Peridon (talk) 22:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I note that the author of this article has several times edited the article about that company that has an article, and that product appears to have the widest specification. Peridon (talk) 22:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SALAT. "Online chart drawing tools" (a better title btw) is not a well-defined subject; if we include any tool that can generates drawings, the scope is way too large. For the record, there is no problem sourcing to the companies' website if the list is exhaustive and the websites unambiguously fall in the criteria for the list, but that is not the case here. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 12:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.