Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of digital SLRs
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:16, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Comparison of digital SLRs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Much much too broad. There are a ton of these products made for 20+ years and it can't be anywhere near completeness, and inclusion of any is likely biased (I only see a few of the biggest brands here). I've made a similar case about Comparison of smartphones. Prebenn (talk) 13:07, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Prebenn (talk) 13:07, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and Products. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:24, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- delete not a comparison but an exhaustive list of the specs of (presumably( every digital SLR ever made. We are not a product database. Mangoe (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.