Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of FTP hosting services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of FTP hosting services

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

blatant WP:OR/WP:SYN, inherent lack of WP:RS, failed WP:GNG. The whole article is based on two sources - one (freehosting) is based on user submissions, and therefore is not WP:RS, another (top10ftphosting) is "top 10" list according to an unknown criteria. Moreover, finding different WP:RS which will allow to create unbiased article on this subject, is extremely unlikely (which also indicates that WP:N is not satisfied). Ipsign (talk) 11:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a review site. --Carnildo (talk) 21:46, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : 7 out of 9 columns provided do not contain any information..can be merged with other FTP pages. or should be improved.but in its current state doesnot show any notability.--Dude7190 (talk) 10:55, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.