Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compactinitic 1137

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 19:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Compactinitic 1137

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverifiable (not a single source could be found for "Compactinitic 1137". If not a hoax, then totally lacking WP:Notability. Fram (talk) 14:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Google search brings only mirrors. Also, if this isn't wp:madeup, it is at best up-and-coming or crystall-bally given "The foundry is currently trying to develop..." Chris857 (talk) 17:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as sub-literate commercial spam. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete: a search of the Vanguard Foundry's website brings up nothing similar. (I suspect that the reference to sulfur is a misinterpretation of chemical symbol Si as S. I don't thing anyone puts sulfur in steel, and the tone of the article looks more uninformed than fraudulent.) הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 00:18, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and looks very much like a hoax particularly with zero hits, outside Wikipedia and mirrors, on 'Compactinitic'. However, we are six days into the AFD so it looks best for this to now run its course. The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above arguments. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 07:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.