Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Health Index

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Community Health Index

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some discussion some years ago, google search shows one discussion on this outside commercial interests where it is deemed difficult to implement and not well understood. This seems to be advertising.

There is a defence on the talk page by the author of a whitepaper. This has not become an industry standard as hoped (assuming good faith). BananaFiend (talk) 09:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Monty ₈₄₅ 14:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agreed, it looks like somewhat of a neologism or buzzword coined by this one company? W Nowicki (talk) 20:38, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.