Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CommunityTSC
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Rothberg Institute for Childhood Diseases. Sam Walton (talk) 16:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- CommunityTSC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Did a quick Google check for notability, couldn't find anything. Project seems to be over, notability not clear from content within, and it hasn't been edited for five years now it looks like. South Nashua (talk) 00:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Googled it and found very little about this. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Merge into Drug Design and Optimization Lab if nothing else, or possibly consider deleting the lot. As a charity project it seems like it mostly spread via forums, but it appears to have been very popular (for a distributed computing project, for its time) back in 2002 or so. This stuff is kind of a gray area in WP's guidelines. Since the popularity was within a non-professional interest group, there weren't outlets interested in covering it regardless of its popularity. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 19:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete or merge into Rothberg Institute For Childhood Diseases or see below. The institute would have a much better chance of satisfying notability levels, if nothing else since it might be still around, or is it defunct too? Perhaps try to make one sustainable article instead of three or four stubs. After a bit of looking, better yet even merge them all into Jonathan Rothberg - ironic that none mention the benefactor? W Nowicki (talk) 18:40, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Follow-up: I worked on the Jonathan Rothberg article a bit, so perhaps now these could all be deleted or redirected. It looks to me like the money mostly ran out in the Great Recession and the projects shut down in 2009. There might be a few staff left at the institute, but certainly the person himself is quite a self-promoter so has much press. W Nowicki (talk) 22:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.