Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community-based Biodiversity Conservation Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 22:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Community-based Biodiversity Conservation Films

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously PRODed article; PROD removed by what appears to be a sock of the creator; article does not establish notability and fails WP:CORP. —Duncan (that's me!)^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 16:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Spam. Fails WP:CORP. Joe Chill (talk) 03:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm not sure that a general WP:CORP argument is the way to go here, and propose a look at the more specific WP:CLUB. This group does come up on the web pages of similar organizations and their work has been described at the international level. But there is a shortage of independent, third party news coverage. I'll leave it to the community to decide the notability question, but a quick look at WP:CORP in general may not be fair. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 11:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.