Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common mistakes in Business Intelligence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Common mistakes in Business Intelligence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
totally unencyclopedic non article WuhWuzDat 19:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Completed AfD tagging and denied A1 speedy. Gigs (talk) 19:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 19:55, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unreferenced essay, WP:NOR. MuffledThud (talk) 19:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Essay. Joe Chill (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an essay. Reach Out to the Truth 23:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above, also reads like coatrack spam: BI software tools are the great source for helping organizations accessing their enterprise information in order to make business decisions to achieve their business objectives....' - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Essay purely consisting of unreferenced original research, Lord Spongefrog, (Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!) 22:07, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.