Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commercial Crew and Cargo Program

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Non admin closure Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 16:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial Crew and Cargo Program

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N Ushau97 ^{talk contribs} 13:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Major US Government programme, nominator has provided no rationale for why it might not be notable. --W. D. Graham 14:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:N morrissinger ^{talk contribs} 13:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC) I see the article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Crew_and_Cargo_Program, has been marked for deletion and has been marked in violation of U.S. Copyright law. As to the first of these points, the article is notable, if for no other reason, because one of the programs run by the subject of the article has an extensive wikipedia article of its own: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Orbital_Transportation_Services[reply]

As to the claim that the text of the article violates copyright, I assume this must pertain to the text of the article, which is based in large part (though not exactly) on the text from the corresponding page of the NASA website. Please see 17 U.S.C. s. 105 (2013), which reads, in the relevant part:

"Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government"

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability is not inherited. The fact that NASA runs a notable project through a program does not automatically make that program notable. To have an article you have to find secondary sources that tell us something about it. Borock (talk) 03:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Commercial Crew Development, which is run by the Commercial Crew and Cargo Program Office (yeah, somebody had fun with that acronym). - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.