Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commandate of Samana Cay
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BJTalk 00:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Commandate of Samana Cay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This micronation appears to be a hoax. Searches for sources return no results except for this website, which is not a reliable source. Cunard (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Even if it's not a hoax, like most micronations, it "exists" only in its creator's mind, and is no different from a private club or organization. No assertion of any notability, no reliable sources, and so on, and so on. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I agree, probably more of a fantasy than an intentional hoax, still WP:MADEUP. No independent references. Delete without mercy and warn the creator. Likely will crop up again. Drawn Some (talk) 22:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable fantasy, without reliable sources, simply crop.--Yopie 23:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- "Keep" as growing and will become known. Plus, there is another source: not a huge site, but looked good to me.Flopo1 (talk) 00:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "Will become known" fails WP:CRYSTAL. And your source isn't reliable. p.s. I found an amusing account of a failed "colonisation" of this island:[1]. p.p.s. Looks nice from the air:[2] Fences and windows (talk) 02:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - They have 14 cities and a population of 10. Err. I mean notability cannot be established via reliable sources. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as said by Oxguy3 in the discussion page, it is highly unlikely to be a hoax.Flopo1 (talk) 02:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Er, no. The speculation that this isn't a hoax is no support. There are no reliable sources, and the island is uninhabited. Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. Fences and windows (talk) 03:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.