Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CollecToons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. kur ykh 00:38, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CollecToons

Contested prod. No assertion of notability. No hint of what the heck an "electronic sticker book" is. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Speedy delete Appears to be a cut and paste interview (see bottom of article). Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the copyvio. Icewedge (talk) 04:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete beta testing for this online game only ended a month ago. Insufficient sources to demonstrate notability. Icewedge (talk) 04:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Article creator; firstly, you have no sources of this being incorrect. The list of beta testers are on CollecToons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 321Taco321 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC) — 321Taco321 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The rationale for deletion has nothing to do with whether or not the information in the article is correct. It has to do with the subject's notability, that is, do we even want an article on this topic? Does the subject meet the minimum notability criteria for games? -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Do we even want an article on this topic?" You should ask the hundreds of users that play before you ask that question. This article is being worked on, proposing it for deletion because you don't find it suitable makes you look like a jerk. User Talk:321Taco321

Firstly, please remain civil. Secondly, having a large user/fanbase doesn't make a subject/site notable in the least. We have guidelines that determine what is or is not notable. Lastly, this article appears to fail the aforementioned guideline, making it a subject for deletion. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 09:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 07:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per ChildofMidnight. Seems to also be a fan site of sorts, based off the beta 1.0 version of Cartoon Orbit. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 13:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all those above. abf /talk to me/ 13:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.