Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Wringe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. overwhelming consensus to keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Wringe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG as a result of WP:SIGCOV. StudiesWorld (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 23:18, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 23:18, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found (and added to the article) 15 reviews of 6 books by him. That's enough for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per David Eppstein. I had searched for stuff about him before nominating him, but I couldn't find any book reviews. Given what David Eppstein has found, I think that he is clearly notable. StudiesWorld (talk) 09:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- To be fair, the reviews were less immediately visible than they often are. Most of them were buried within longer book review columns rather than being individually-searchable publications. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 10:55, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep in light of the recent improvements by Eppstein. Subject meets WP:AUTHOR.Thsmi002 (talk) 10:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets notability criteria as per WP:NAUTHOR. Spyder212 (talk) 14:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:AUTHOR at the very least. --Tataral (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:AUTHOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per David Eppstein.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:58, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.