Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Col Stringer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 04:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Col Stringer

Delete not notable or encyclopaedic Teapotgeorge^Talk 20:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Oh dear, there seems to be several Google book search hits for him! Oh wait, they're all by him, never mind... Unfortunately, no third-party sources, no notability. DARTH PANDA ^duel 21:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Keep. Oh dear indeed. Good work, Shoessss! DARTH PANDA ^duel 21:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – As quoted by the Age, one of “…Australia’s three best-loved authors”. I inline cited and referenced the piece. Can use some more work, but this worth keeping. Thanks ShoesssS ^Talk 21:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per Shoessss. Schuym1 (talk) 21:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:12, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Shoesss cleanup, definitely establishes notability StarM 02:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.