Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coke mini
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow merge (non-admin closure). Equazcion (talk) 01:49, 18 Mar 2010 (UTC)
- Coke mini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although it is referenced that this exists, it does not seem to be a notable product right now. This article constitutes a content fork of Coca cola. The existence in the Wikipedia seems to be largely advertising for the company, and seems to be devoid of individual Encyclopedic merit sufficient to warrant its own article. When all's said and done, it's still just Coca Cola. I call MERGE to Coca Cola- Wolfkeeper 18:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow merge per nom, and I really think discussing this is a waste of time. Could've been merged without discussion. There isn't a snowball's chance in hell of any other outcome. Equazcion (talk) 19:57, 17 Mar 2010 (UTC)
- Agree with Equazcion, this could've just been a bold merge. –xenotalk 20:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Welllll... probably best to let it run its course. There's been anon editors working it, and it's bad form to just steam roller over them.- Wolfkeeper 20:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with Equazcion, this could've just been a bold merge. –xenotalk 20:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball. I've merged and redirected to Coca-Cola. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 22:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You can't do that until after the AFD is closed.- Wolfkeeper 22:53, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why did you take the article to AfD in the first place? Merging is a normal editing action. If you think merging something improves the encyclopedia, be bold and perform the merger yourself or outline your proposal on the talk page. — Rankiri (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It had already been prodded and unprodded. An AFD merge is different to a merge edit anyway.- Wolfkeeper 01:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why did you take the article to AfD in the first place? Merging is a normal editing action. If you think merging something improves the encyclopedia, be bold and perform the merger yourself or outline your proposal on the talk page. — Rankiri (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow Unomi (talk) 23:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Any editor can perform a snow closure, as long as it's not a delete. It's obvious this will end in a merge. Situations like these are what WP:SNOW was made for. There's no reason to go through the motions. I'm closing this now. Equazcion (talk) 01:49, 18 Mar 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.