Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClueNet (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ClueNet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Fails WP:GNG. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 16:00, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—No significant coverage in secondary, reliable sources. Does not meet guidelines in WP:CORPDEPTH. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 06:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Keep - Nomination failed to address any of the issues or the consensus reached in prior AfDs. ~Adjwilley (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]