Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clone Army Builders Guild
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted (A7). (non-admin closure) Rnb (talk) 05:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Clone Army Builders Guild (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Lego collectors club, no clear notability. Oscarthecat (talk) 17:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, as I tagged it earlier, no notability whatsoever. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 17:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- More info in being added. So I think think we should leave this one be for now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.114.27.72 (talk) 17:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC) — 76.114.27.72 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- While there is more info, there are no links to a third party source to confirm notablity. Livewireo (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete,the article lacks a neutral POV. Also, there are obvious questions of notability. A search of Google News turns up nothing, and a search of Google Hits turns up little more than the group's website and advertisements for the group's website on other forums. per the Wikipedia guidelines on organizations, this article seems to fail as the scope of it's reach appears limited only to those that are a member with little to no influence otherwise. JogCon (talk) 18:35, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't imagine notability ever bein established for this. Quantpole (talk) 19:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as an article about web content that does not assert notability. Rnb (talk) 19:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - I've re-added the speedy tag which was removed by an IP. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 00:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.