Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClickaBet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ClickaBet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references are actually press releases making an announcement of the firm's existence, regardless of where published --just read them. DGG ( talk ) 04:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as regardless of any other amount of coverage, this is still noticeably too soon and nothing else convincing would suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 09:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I didn't find sources reaching WP:GNG. --joe decker ^talk 01:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.