Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Click here
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 02:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Click here (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Simply not ingrained enough in culture. Not sufficiently notable (perhaps "yet") in its own right. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 15:09, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It amuses me that all the references used in the article to support notability are claiming that the phrase "click here" should not be used. A thought: if all sorts of reliable sources are found claiming "Joe Snooks is not notable", would this make him notable? Thincat (talk) 20:38, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Delete John Doe and Tommy Atkins are notable purely because of their (intentional) non-notability. "Click here" isn't. Tonywalton Talk 23:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-intentional non-notability. (And thank you for a very good answer to my question). Thincat (talk) 17:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete John Doe and Tommy Atkins are notable purely because of their (intentional) non-notability. "Click here" isn't. Tonywalton Talk 23:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have struck my earlier contributions because they were not sufficiently serious. The article has worthwhile content and has been developed over the years by a considerable number of editors. Even if an article is not fully justified (and have no view on this) the material could be included at many places, such as [1][2][3][4][5]. Unfortunately, none of these seem like a good redirect target to me. Thincat (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This deserves as passing mention in several other articles at most. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 17:38, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Trans-wiki to en.wiktionary.org. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Mystery meat navigation A:-)Brunuś (talk) 17:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Click here to delete - simply not notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.