Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleversafe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 03:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cleversafe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page contains advertising content related to a small, privately held company. The company is not an appropriate topic for an encyclopedia page, nor is the PR-style article a neutral, non-biased description of the company. As this entry exists purely to promote the company, it should be deleted Kdb150 (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no real evidence of notability Al pst al refs are local press releases. The WSJ award is not a first place, but a minor award in category. DGG ( talk ) 02:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stub: I noticed it won the WSJ Innovation award[1], which unlike the rest of the award spam is actually a significant award. Did a quick Google News search[2] and there are plenty of sources. The current article is an advert, so suggest stubbing and watchlisting. CorporateM (Talk) 04:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – A WP:CORPDEPTH pass. Sources include [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Of note is that the article was stubbified on 8 April 2015‎. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.