Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleo Manago
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cleo Manago (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Was listed at Deletion review by User:Beatmakerz. Reason for deletion is 'Article appears to be written by it's own subject, ("Wikipaeton" appears to be Manago himself) Article is not at all encyclopedic in nature, full of self-egrandizing. He includes an "interview" with himself. Language is ego-centric, not objective. Sources he lists do not actually support information in the article. If not deletion, article needs substantial editing. Wikipedia articles should be written by someone objective and not the articles subject himself' I have no opinion. Davewild (talk) 14:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's hard to tell if he is notable or not. He does get a few Ghits from others talking about him. What this page needs is someone who is familiar with the field the subject works in and knows how notable he is or isn't in the community. Whatever the case this page needs a lot of work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberon (talk • contribs) 14:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Most of the article is a (highly unencyclopedic) "interview", and what's left is both poorly-sourced and doesn't pass WP:BIO anyway. Add in a fairly blatant WP:COI/vanity article too. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Zero news hits. Anyone with a few blogs and sites can get 1000 Google hits. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.