Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleeng
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cleeng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Simply not notable by Wikipedia's standards. Has had a notification for adding citations since Dec. 2010. RBrideau (talk) 02:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Simply because the article has had a ref improve tag since December 2010 isn't a reasonable case to delete the article. From experience, I have seen articles with ref improve tags since 2006 or 2007 and incomparable to this article. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. I could not find any significant independent coverage of this company or product at Google News Archive. What appeared to be coverage turned out to be press releases or items from the "comments" section of a newspaper's blog. The Reliable Source links provided in the article do not mention Cleeng. --MelanieN (talk) 01:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:42, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Maybe it could seem a bit improper to delete this article since this company is the main partner of almost all the bigger video hoster of the web:brightcove, twistage. Its solutions are also used by big players such as livestream that organizes big event like the Organo Gold Convention. Cleeng is also one of the main partner of the european press with partners like the French newspaper La Tribune. Also, you can observe that dailymotion Premium Offer is handled by Cleeng. --Baptiste90 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:44, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - A press release,[1] another press release,[2] and a US trademark.[3] That's about all the published info. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 07:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.