Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clash of Streamers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clash of Streamers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The subject in question was not extensively covered by reliable sources AdrianGamer (talk) 12:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No WP:SIGCOV in reliable, independent, sources found in my WP:BEFORE. FOARP (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - failure of the WP:GNG. I couldn’t find a single reliable source (beware false positives with a name consisting entirely of generic buzzwords.) Sergecross73 msg me 03:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, sources unavailable, may be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:N. Anarchyte (talk | work) 05:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 23:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is a stub lacking sources.TH1980 (talk) 02:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.