Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens of Humanity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citizens of Humanity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:24, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Completing nomination for User:Frap. On the merits, I have no opinion. In posting the AFD tag on the article, Frap used the edit summary "Advertisement". I've asked them to come around here and expand on that concern. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article is currently written like an advert for this organisation and I don't see any WP:RS coverage for it thus far. It could only be kept if it was drastically slimmed down in size. --Artene50 (talk) 19:25, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable sources cited in the article to assert the brand's notability. Most of the article appears to be sourced to the brand's own website in violation of WP:ABOUTSELF. --Tdl1060 (talk) 05:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.