Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chulek synthesizer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chulek synthesizer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG/WP:NPRODUCT. Article was draftified earlier (Draft:Chulek synthesizer, submission declined), so this circumvents the WP:AfC-process. All that after attempts to hijack the article Chulek. Good reasons (username for one) to assume WP:COI and the history of the draft quacks like a WP:DUCK with a megaphone. Kleuske (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom. The handful of references don't mention the Chulek specifically and are simply about synthesizers in general. No indication that this synthesizer is notable at all. This is COI advertising. Notfrompedro (talk) 12:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article does not satisfy product notability, which is the applicable guideline. Analysis of the sources shows that they are reliable information about synthesizers in general, not about this product.

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	MusicTech	Discussion of subtractive synthesis.	Yes	Not with respect to product.	Yes	Yes
2	MusicTech	Discussion of types of synthesis	Yes	Not with respect to product.	Yes	Yes
3	Oxford University Press	A book about synthesizers	Yes	Not with respect to product.	Yes	Yes

- - This page exists in both draft space and article space, having already been moved to draft space once by the nominator. The author or authors appear to be trying to game the system. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draftify - It looks like a promising synth, but I cannot find any articles about it. Must be new and WP:TOOSOON. Boredathome101 (talk) 08:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.