Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology in the DC animated universe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology in the DC animated universe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost entirely unsourced, WP:OR, and cruft. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:06, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete per the precident of the Star Wars chronology AfD and WP:WAF. Articles about fiction should use real life as their primary frame of reference, including plot summary is part of this but such exhaustive treatment of in-universe information is better suited to a fan wikia than Wikipedia. HominidMachinae (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete - after transwikifying to DC Animated Universe Wiki (if it does not already exist there, though it probably does). Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 07:46, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The content of the article is original research and original research by synthesis. The topic itself does not exist in reliable third-party sources. There is only one reference in the article that is unrelated to the chonology itself. The topic does not meet the general notability guideline and it can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work. Jfgslo (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no third-party sources to WP:verify notability, and this is mainly a WP:PLOT synopsis which is what Wikpiedia articles are WP:NOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.