Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Roper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Roper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be merged from Christopher roper (caps diff), also up for AFD . Non notable, self published references. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find no significant coverage about him although I can confirm his role as editor [1]. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonnotable journalistCurb Chain (talk) 00:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable South African journalist, editor of the Mail & Guardian Online,[2] considered one of South Africa's "top online managers",[3] recognized as an expert on press ethics and social media,[4] winner of two PICA industry awards for his work, including South African Columnist of the Year,[5][6] and one Mondi silver Features Award.[7] Also received a grant from the U.S. State Department as part of the selected US State Dept. Foreign Press contingent. Viriditas (talk) 04:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, m.o.p 18:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 03:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.