Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris ogbechie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Ogbechie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:ACADEMIC). Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 14:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify A quick Google search showed a strong chance that this subject passes WP: GNG. Whether or not the article is ready for the mainspace is debatable, but notability on Wikipedia extends past the article alone. On the first search page there are multiple in-depth accounts from independent sources; whether or not they are regarded as reliable is another question. I believe they are. The article itself also has some “peacocking” which I addressed prior to this statement. NiklausGerard (talk) 02:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: While it is likely that Ogbechie passes WP:NACADEMIC this is a total WP:BLP failure. One single reference is insufficient, but does let it slide past a WP:BLPPROD. This might have been better draftified unilaterally than coming to AfD, and that would be the best outcome to allow referencing and development 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.