Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Ulugia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Ulugia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Non-notable rugby league player who fails WP:RLN, having never played at Super League or NRL level. J Mo 101 (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I'm torn here, he seems to fail WP:RLN (I assume he didn't play in the Super8's?) but there is quite a bit of coverage on him, so he probably passes GNG [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The article as it stands is sparse but I think overall he is notable. Mattlore (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from maybe the Daily Mercury article, can any of those be considered significant coverage though? J Mo 101 (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources found by Mattlore. Some of them fail as WP:GNG sources due to not being independent (the club websites) or being WP:ROUTINE. But even removing those sources, I think what is included shows GNG is met. Therefore keep. RonSigPi (talk) 23:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 16:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources found by Mattlore, in particular this, this and this, which let the subject meet GNG, in my view. Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.