Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choike

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as non notable per WP:WEB, and WP:N Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Choike

Could not find any sources that establish notability. Many g-hits for "choike.org" were simply pages of the website in question. Also borders on reading like an advertisement. Samuel Tan 09:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The article needs complete re-writing so as to not sound like a copy/paste of a website or as an advert. The concept of Choike, if it is indeed what it says it is, remains valid - a multilingual portal for a certain population, so it has some notability. BMW(drive) 16:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it's a "valid concept" doesn't mean it's appropriate for coverage in Wikipedia. Mango juice^talk 13:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; Alexa rank around 300,000, and no sources. And this is an advertisement, or at the very least, not an appropriate article. Unless someone cleans it up right away, there's no reason to let it linger around just in case. Mango juice^talk 13:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a google news search produces a single reliable source, an article in Rebelion.org. Overall, there doesn't appear to be significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 14:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:WEB --T-rex 15:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.